Preview

Humans and their health

Advanced search

Priorities and innovations in the treatment of urgent complications of gastric and duodenal ulcer in urban and regional general surgical hospitals

https://doi.org/10.21626/vestnik/2026-2/02

EDN: GEGEJI

Abstract

The experience of the city and two district general surgical hospitals in providing emergency care to patients with urgent complications of peptic ulcer of the stomach and duodenum in the periods 2003-2005 and 2022-2025 was subjected to a comparative analysis. The priority methods of treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers were open operations from laparotomy access with perforation removal. Laparoscopic technologies are of limited use, the reasons for this are morphological factors of localization and the state of the ulcerative process, as well as organizational and economic (low equipment of medical institutions with appropriate equipment and insufficient training of personnel). Complications decreased by 1.2 times, but mortality increased from 5.4% to 7.3%, i.e. the rejection of the radical anti-ulcer stage did not improve the situation. In the surgery of ulcerative bleeding, the main tactical principle is the priority use of endoscopic methods to stop bleeding. Injection or contact thermal degradation is used as the first stage, and if ineffective, remote argon plasma coagulation is used. The effectiveness of endoscopic "hemostasis" was 96.1%, while the effectiveness of repeated photocoagulation procedures was noted in patients with a high risk of recurrence or manifestation of bleeding, which reduced surgical activity to 5.6%. The priority was open surgical interventions in the amount of excision or stitching of the ulcer (42.4%). Radical, resection methods or duodenoplasty (56.9%). Postoperative complications and mortality were 72.1% and 67.0%, due to comorbid patients with a high degree of surgical and anesthetic risk, but the overall mortality decreased from 7.7% to 3.9%, which indicates positive trends in the treatment of patients with ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding. To facilitate the performance of operations in the subhepatic and central subdiaphragmatic spaces, as well as for a better examination of the gastric cavity during gastrotomy, the use of multifunctional LED lighting instruments is recommended.

About the Authors

Sergey A. Kolesnikov
Belgorod State National Research University (NRU "BelSU")
Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Faculty Surgery, NRU "BelSU", Belgorod, Russian Federation



Sofia R. Bugaeva
Korocha Central District Hospital (Korocha CDH)
Russian Federation

Competing Interests:

Resident physician, Korocha CDH, Korocha, Russian Federation



Vitaly V. Bugaev
Korocha Central District Hospital (Korocha CDH)
Russian Federation

Resident physician of the surgical department, Korocha CDH, Korocha, Russian Federation



Oleg M. Zhdanovsky
Prokhorovka Central District Hospital (Prokhorovka CDH)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Chief physician, Prokhorovka CDH, Prokhorovka, Russian Federation



Alexander N. Semenov
Medical Center for Laser Surgery, Proctology and Phlebology
Russian Federation

Chief Physician, Medical Center for Laser Surgery, Proctology and Phlebology, Belgorod, Russain Federation



Oleg V. Zakharov
Belgorod State National Research University (NRU "BelSU"); Belgorod City Hospital No. 2
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Faculty Surgery, NRU "BelSU", Belgorod; City Hospital No. 2 of Belgorod, Belgorod, Russian Federation



References

1. Shabunin A.V., Bedin V.V., Grekov D.N., Yakomaskin V.N., Eminov M.Z., Shikov D.V. Justification of the choice of surgical approach in perforated peptic ulcer. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2020;(1):7-12 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17238/issn2072-3180.2020.1.7-12. EDN: ATOCRT.

2. Khripun A.I., Sazhin I.V., Churkin A.A., Alimov A.N., Asratyan S.A. Outcomes of application the enhanced recovery protocol for perforated duodenal ulcer. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2021;(1):47-53 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17238/issn2072-3180.2021.1.47-53. EDN: BRJFZZ.

3. Magomedov M.M., Omarov M.D., Magomedov M.A.Comparative characteristics of the methods of surgical treatment of gastroduodenal perforating ulcers.International Research Journal. 2021; 11(2-113):182-187 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.23670/IRJ.2021.113.11.068. EDN: OGNCZC.

4. Tarasenko S.V., Natalsky A.A., Panin S.I., Sazhin I.V., Yudin V.A., Sazhin V.P., Peskov O.D., Bogomolov A.Yu. Modern aspects of the complex treatment of perforated gastric and duodenal ulcer. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2021;(1):42-46 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202101142. EDN: ZMCHGH.

5. Yartsev P.A., Sajaya Y.K., Rogal M.M., Stinskaya N.A., Kirsanov I.I., Baskhanov Sh.A., Kazakova V.V. The first experience of hybrid surgical treatment in a patient with a perforative duodenal ulcer using a fully covered self-expandable nitinol stent (clinical case). Moscow Surgical Journal. 2025;(4):138-144 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17238/2072-3180-2025-4-138-144. EDN: UHNWTE.

6. Vasilenko L.I., Borota A.V., Polunin G.E., Lutsenko Yu.G., Gulmamedov V.A. The metodic of pyloro-duodenoplasty in perforated and stenosing pyloro-duodenal ulcers. Arkhiv klinicheskoy i eksperimental'noy meditsiny. 2022;31(3):266-268 (in Russ.). EDN: GCGYHN.

7. Krylov N.N., Babkin O.V, Babkin D.O. Evaluation of the quality of life in patients after radical surgery for perforated duodenal ulcers. Sechenov Medical Journal. 2016;(1-23):53-57 (in Russ.). EDN: ZANGQH.

8. Chernousov A.F., Bogopol'skiy P.M., Kurbanov F.S. Surgery of Gastric and Duodenal Ulcer. A Guide for Doctors. Moscow: Meditsina, 1996. 253 p. (in Russ.)

9. Onopriyev V.I., Korotko G.F., Korochanskaya N.V., Serikova S.N., editors. Gastric ulcer. Krasnodar: Gruppa B, 2006. 488 p. (In Russ.)

10. Popandopulo K.I., Korochanskaya N.V. Surgical treatment of acute complications of dyodenal ulcer on the munucipal level. Nauchnyy vestnik Zdravookhraneniya Kubani. 2010;7(1-4).URL: https://vestnik.kkb2-kuban.ru/storage/docu-ments/69.pdf (in Russ.)

11. Lavreshin P.M., Brusnev L.A., Gorbunkov V.Ya., Volostnikov E.V., Ebzeev A.Kh., Efimov А.V., Zhernosenko А.О. Experience in the treatment of gastroduodenal bleeding ulcer etiology in a city hospital. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2019;14(2):42-44 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25881/BPNMSC.2019.55.29.009. EDN: UMEDRO.

12. Povalyaev A.V., Duvanskij V.A., Chernekhovskaya N.E. Erosive and ulcerative gastrointestinal bleeding in patients at risk: clinic, diagnosis, treatment. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2020;15(4):39-44 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25881/BPNMSC.2020.54.37.008. EDN: LNSSSH.

13. Timerbulatov Sh.V., Valeev M.V. The peptic ulcer bleeding. rebleeding prediction and the choice of treatment tactics. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2020;(2):12-18 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17238/issn2072-3180.2020.2.12-18. EDN: OCJFBM.

14. Evteev E.O., Mironov A.V., Budanova M.B., Tveritneva L.F., Yartsev P.A. Three-stage hemostasis in the treatment of patients with gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding. Vestnik khirurgicheskoy gastroenterologi. 2021;(4):46-51 (in Russ.). EDN: TZBLOH.

15. Bedin V.V., Korzheva I.Yu., Vlasenko A.V., Mikhalyants G.S., Tsurkan V.A., Bocharnikov D.S., Sokolov K.A. Bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer with a high risk of recurrence. treatment tactics. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2025;(2):200-212 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17238/2072-3180-2025-2-200-212. EDN: AYAEGQ.

16. Sinenchenko G.I., Verbitskiy V.G., Demko A.E., Sekeyev A.N., Alentyev S.A., Kiselev M., Parfenov A.O., Alimov P.A. The results of using endovascular methods for stopping ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding. Herald of North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov. 2021;13(1):103-108 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17816/mechnikov62306. EDN: GGBOTY.

17. Parkhomenko I.E., Kulikovsky V.F., Parfenov I.P., Fadeev A.I. Features of providing emergency surgical care to patients with ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding through the regional air ambulance service. Sovremennyye naukoyemkiye tekhnologii. 2007;(6): 72-74 (in Russ.). EDN: IIXEDN.

18. Sazhin V.P., Beburishvili A.G., Panin S.I., Sazhin I.V., Postolov M.P. Influence of the incidence of ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding on the effectiveness of treatment. Statistical surveillance. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2021;(1):27-33 (in Russ.). DOI. 10.17116/hirurgia202101127. EDN: FUGNIY.

19. Onopriyev V.I. Etudes in functional surgery of peptic ulcer disease. Krasnodar: Izdatel'sko-poligraficheskoye proizvodstvennoye arendnoye predpriyatiye, 1995. 293 p. (in Russ.)

20. Chernousov A.F., Khorobrykh T.V., Bogopol'skiy P.M. Surgery for gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer. Moscow: Prakticheskaya meditsina, 2016. 351 p. (in Russ.)

21. Kolesnikov S.A., Bezhin A.I., Bugaev V.V., Bugaeva S.R., Kunitsa E.V. Technical innovations in surgery of hard-to-reach places of the thoracic and abdominal cavities.Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2023;7(2):26-36 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/operhirurg2023702126. EDN: ABFCAI.


Review

For citations:


Kolesnikov S.A., Bugaeva S.R., Bugaev V.V., Zhdanovsky O.M., Semenov A.N., Zakharov O.V. Priorities and innovations in the treatment of urgent complications of gastric and duodenal ulcer in urban and regional general surgical hospitals. Humans and their health. 2026;29(2):12-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21626/vestnik/2026-2/02. EDN: GEGEJI

Views: 10

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-5746 (Print)
ISSN 1998-5754 (Online)