A systematic review and meta-analysis of the extraand intra-organ vasculature of the spleen by Russian Science Citation Index articles
https://doi.org/10.21626/vestnik/2024-3/08
EDN: TABMRQ
Abstract
Aim - to present up-to-date data on the extra- and intraorgan vasculature (arterial and venous) of the spleen in different sex, age and body type groups. Materials and Methods. The search was carried out using the Russian Science Citation Index. The selection of materials for inclusion in the review was performed by two independent researchers. The exclusion of unsuitable works occurred in two stages: on the first, papers with inappropriate titles and annotations were excluded, on the second, articles with unsuitable full texts. The analysis was performed using the statistical software R (version 4.1) and the metafor R extension package. Random effects models were used for all analyses. I2 and t2 statistics were used to measure the heterogeneity between studies. Results. The analysis included 32 papers, the publication period of which is from 2001 to 2023. The results of a meta-analysis of the diameter of the splenic artery show that the average diameter of this artery is estimated at about 5.42 mm, with a standard error of 0.27 mm. The results of the meta-analysis of the diameter of the splenic vein also show significant heterogeneity between the studies, which is confirmed by the high statistical values of I2 (99.9%) and H2 (1007.9). This indicates differences in results between studies, which may be caused by differences in methodology, the study group, and other factors. Conclusions. Knowledge of the variant anatomy of the spleen vessels is important for planning and performing operations on the spleen and abdominal organs in general.
About the Authors
Ali S. DadashevRussian Federation
Ilia S. Miltykh
Darya Α. Sukmanova
Vadim Α. Mishin
Oleg K. Zenin
Russian Federation
Edgar S. Kafarov
Russian Federation
References
1. Larsen J.W., Søreide K., Søreide J.A., Tjosevik K., Kvaløy J.T., Thorsen K. Epidemiology of abdominal trauma: An age- and sex-adjusted incidence analysis with mortality patterns. Injury. 2022;53(10):3130-3138. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.06.020.
2. Fredericks C.J., Galante J.M. Splenic injuries. In: Asensio JA, Meredith JW, eds. Current Therapy of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care (Third Edition). Elsevier, 2024:398-405. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-323-69787-3.00068-X.
3. Savage S.A. Management of blunt splenic injury: down the rabbit hole and into the bucket. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2023;8(Suppl 1):e001119. DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001119.
4. Bokor-Billmann T., Billmann F. Spleen. In: Billmann F, Keck T, eds. Essentials of Visceral Surgery : For Residents and Fellows. Springer, 2023:281-292. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-66735-4_11.
5. Scott-Conner C.E. Scott-Conner & Dawson: Essential Operative Techniques and Anatomy: Fourth Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013. Capter №70, Splenectomy and Splenorrhaphy. P. 368-378.
6. Miltykh I., Kafarov E.S., Covantsev S., Dadashev A.S., Skarlis A.A., Zenin O.K. A new dimension in medical education: Virtual reality in anatomy during COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical Anatomy. 2023;36(7):1007-1015. DOI: 10.1002/ca.24098.
7. Ishikawa Y., Ehara K., Yamada T., Matsuzawa N., Arai S., Ban D., Kudo A., Tanabe M., Kawashima Y., Sakamoto H. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of the vascular anatomy of the splenic hilum for gastric cancer surgery. Surgery Today. 2018;48(9):841-847. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-018-1679-y.
8. Ouzzani M., Hammady H., Fedorowicz Z., Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. 2016;5(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
9. Viechtbauer W. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package. Journal of Statistical Software. 2010;36:1-48. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v036.i03.
10. Pavlov S.P., Bayrakov S.E., Zyablikova E.I., Nosoulya I.G. Variant anatomy and morphometric characterisation of the primal trunk and its branches according to multispiral computed tomography. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2023;12(4):62-67 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18499/2225-7357-2023-12-4-62-67. EDN: GREPGC.
11. Moshkin A.S., Sheverdin N.N., Novikov M.S., Stupin A.S. The role of ultrasound dopplerography of the splenic vein in the prospects of solving surgical problems. The Medicus. 2022;(5):65-68. EDN: EWNLKN
12. Bezborodova A.P., Vashurkina I.M., Terichev A.E., Shalin V.V., Karasev N.V. Variant anatomy of the abdominal trunk and its clinical significance. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2022;(2):89 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17513/spno.31556. EDN: AILHOE.
13. Mikutskaya N.V., Dydykin S.S. Mathematical modeling of geometric parameters of blood vessels in normal and portal hypertension. Medical science and education of the Urals. 2022;23(1):108-110 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.36361/1814-8999-2022-23-1-108-110. EDN: QSNAEJ.
14. Gaivoronsky I.V., Zheleznov L.M., Kovalenko N.A., Nichiporuk G.I., Fandeeva O.M., Goryacheva I.A., Gaivoronskaya M.G. Surgical significance of the topography and morphometric characteristics of the ventral trunk and its branches in their typical and atypical architectonics. Vyatka Medical Bulletin. 2021;(2):14-20 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2220-7880-2021-10168. EDN: TZYSLO.
15. Grishechkin V., Vvedensky D. Differences in the parameters of the unpaired branches of the abdominal aorta in men with different body types. Science and innovation. 2021;(3):67-71 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.29235/1818-9857-2021-3-67-71. EDN: SIAOLC.
16. Perepelitsa S.A., Perminova L.A., Stepanyan I.A., Zakhar E.V. Morphometric characteristics of the spleen in infectious mononucleosis (ultrasound examination). Infection and immunity. 2021;11(3):556-564 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15789/2220-7619-MCO-1481. EDN: ZORDAT.
17. Russian A.N., Shabokha A.D., Tyumentsev N.V., Derevtsova S.N. Features of morphometric parameters of vessels of the human portal system revealed by multispiral computed tomography. Bulletin of Siberian medicine. 2021;20(4):49-55 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.20538/1682-0363-2021-4-49-55. EDN: JYWOOB.
18. Vvedensky D.V., Grishechkin V.Yu., Zhdanovich V.N. Morphometric features of the unpaired branches of the abdominal aorta in age and sexual aspects. Journal of the Grodno State Medical University. 2020;18(6):687-691 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25298/2221-8785-2020-18-5-687-691. EDN: PFPPWX.
19. Vvedensky D.V., Grishechkin V.Yu., Mikulich A.O. Morphometric features of unpaired branches of the aorta in women. Bulletin of the Smolensk State Medical Academy. 2020;19(3):93-98 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.37903/vsgma.2020.3.12. EDN: EHJHVO.
20. Gaivoronsky I.V., Kovalenko N.A., Rodionov A.A., Kotov A.B., Nichiporuk G.I., Goryacheva I.A. Features of the formation and topographic-anatomical relations of the confluence of the portal vein. Vyatka Medical Bulletin. 2020;(3):60-65 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2220-7880-2020-10108. EDN: XSGPZA.
21. Bykov P.M., Gaivoronsky I.V., Gaivoronskaya M.G., Sinenchenko G.I.Comparative characteristics of morphometric parameters of the abdominal aorta and its unpaired branches in men with different body types. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2019;8(2):15-21 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18499/2225-7357-2019-8-2-15-21. EDN: AYYOLZ.
22. Gaivoronsky I.V., Bykov P.M., Gaivoronskaya M.G.Comparative characteristics of morphometric parameters of the abdominal part of the aorta and its unpaired branches in age and sexual aspects. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2019;(2):37-42 (in Russ.). EDN: XDRPTK.
23. Gaivoronsky I.V., Bykov P.M., Gaivoronskaya M.G., Sinenchenko G.I.Comparative characteristics of age, sex and typical morphometric parameters of unpaired branches of the abdominal aorta of an adult according to computed tomography. Morphological statements. 2019;27(2):13-18 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.20340/mv-mn.19(27).02.13-18. EDN: XDCDCJ.
24. Gaivoronskiy, I. V., Bykov, P. M., Gaivoronskaya, M. G., & Sinenchenko, G. I.Comparative characteristics of the morphometric parameters of the abdominal aorta and its unpaired branches in women with different body types. Kursk scientific-practical bulletin “Man and his health”. 2019;(1):93-102 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21626/vestnik/2019-1/11. EDN: IZINCS.
25. Gaivoronsky I.V., Kotiv B.N., Kovalenko N.A., Lazarenko V.A. Variant anatomy of the great vessels of the portal vein system and its applied significance. Kursk scientific-practical bulletin “Man and his health”. 2018;(2):70-75 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21626/vestnik/2018-2/11. EDN: XTCVJJ.
26. Fateev I.N., Fateev A.I. Lifetime morphometry of the human splenic artery according to magnetic resonance imaging. The Almanac of Young Science. 2018;(4):35-39 (in Russ.). EDN: YUIPVZ.
27. Hetman N.V. Histometry of the splenic and portal veins in normal and age-related portal hypertension syndrome. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2017;(2):49-53 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25207/1608-6228-2017-2-49-53.
28. Kolsanov A.V., Manukyan A.A., Zelter P.M., Chaplygin S.S., Zvonareva Z.N. Variant anatomy of the portal vein according to computed tomography. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2017;6(4):31-36 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.18499/2225-7357-2017-6-4-31-36.
29. Kolsanov A.V., Yaremin B.I., Yunusov R.R., Nazaryan A.K. Variant anatomy of the splenic artery according to computer modeling data. Morphological statements. 2017;25(2):27-31 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.20340/mv-mn.17(25).02.04.
30. Bychkov V.G., Lukina G.A. Morphometric characteristics of the ventral trunk.International Student Scientific Bulletin. 2016;(2):4 (In Russ.). URL: https://eduherald.ru/ru/article/view?id=14344. EDN: WZFIGD.
31. Kuchieva M.B., Chaplygina E.V., Kaplunova O.A., Ovseenko T.E., Morozova A.V. Age-related features of the arterial bed of the spleen according to postmortem angiography and ultrasound imaging. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2016;(3):116 (in Russ.). EDN: WXJAZP.
32. Belik O.V., Katerenyuk I.M., Spiney L. Variants of splenic artery branching in the organ gate area in age and sexual aspects. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2015;4(3):26-27 (in Russ.). EDN: V AZMH.
33. Bychkov V.G., Dyachenko V.N. Morphometric parameters of the splenic artery as a topographic and anatomical basis for the safety of endovascular interventions.International Student Scientific Bulletin. 2015;(6):61 (in Russ.). URL: https://eduherald.ru/ru/article/view?id=13403.
34. Semioshko N.V. Variant anatomy of the branching of the abdominal trunk and adjacent lymph nodes. Pediatric Bulletin of the Southern Urals. 2015;(1):37-42 (in Russ.)
35. Hetman N.V., Minaev S.V., Sumkina O.B., Romanova N.M. Histostructure and histometry of the splenic vein in normal and portal hypertension. Medical Bulletin of the North Caucasus. 2014;9(1):58-62 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14300/mnnc.2014.09017.
36. Stepanov V.G. Structural and functional characteristics of intraorgan arterial architectonics of the spleen in the age aspect and in atherosclerosis. Scientific papers of the Southern Branch of the National University of Bioresources and Environmental Management of Ukraine “Crimean Agrotechnological University” Series: Veterinary Sciences. 2013;(155):242-254 (in Russ.). EDN: RASTGD.
37. Shai A.M., Makhniborod A.V., Kiryakulov G.S., Zhdanov E.V., Kryukov E.L.Comparative characteristics of the arterial bed of the spleen of men and women, 1st and 2nd period of mature growth. Tauride Medical and Biological Bulletin. 2013;16(1):212 (in Russ.)
38. Nechaeva G.I., Lyalyukova E.A., Orlova N.I. Features of abdominal blood flow in patients of various constitutional types. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. 2011;(1):120-122 (in Russ.)
39. Shvedavchenko A.I., Kudryashova V.A., Russian T.L., Mikhailenko O.S. On the anatomy of the abdominal trunk. Scientific notes of St. Petersburg State Medical University named after Academician Pavlov. 2011;18(2):166-167 (in Russ.)
40. Mitkov V.V. Dopplerographic parameters of the abdominal blood flow are normal. Ultrasound and functional diagnostics. 2001;(1):53-61 (in Russ.). EDN: VVHVSV.
41. Standring S., Gray H. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 42nd ed. Elsevier; 2021.1562 p.
42. Kolsanov A.V., Ivanova V.D., Yaremin B.I., Chaplygin S.S., Nazaryan A.K., Yunusov R.R. Study of the variant anatomy of the arteries of the upper floor of the abdominal cavity based on computer modeling. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2017;6(3):38-43 (in Russ.). EDN: ZPDAKL.
43. Kafarov E.S., Miltykh I., Dmitriev A.V., Zenin O.K. Anatomical variability of kidney arterial vasculature based on zonal and segmental topography. Heliyon. 2023;9(4):e15315. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15315.
44. Nakamura S., Tsuzuki T. Surgical anatomy of the hepatic veins and the inferior vena cava. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics. 1981;152(1):43-50.
45. Krumm P., Schraml C., Bretschneider C., Seeger A., Klumpp B., Kramer U., Claussen C.D., Miller S. Depiction of variants of the portal confluence venous system using multidetector row CT: Analysis of 916 cases. RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren. 2011;183(12):1123-1129. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281745.
Review
For citations:
Dadashev A.S., Miltykh I.S., Sukmanova D.Α., Mishin V.Α., Zenin O.K., Kafarov E.S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the extraand intra-organ vasculature of the spleen by Russian Science Citation Index articles. Humans and their health. 2024;27(3):72-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21626/vestnik/2024-3/08. EDN: TABMRQ