Craniometric characteristics of the trigeminal ganglion impression and the structures for the exit of its branches in different skull shapes
https://doi.org/10.21626/vestnik/2025-2/10
EDN: 611.831.5
Abstract
A detailed study of the variant anatomy of the internal base in the area of the middle cranial fossa is of interest to practitioners of various specialties. The paper provides data on the morphometric and topographic-anatomical characteristics of the formations of the middle cranial fossa associated with the intracranial part of the trigeminal nerve (trigeminal depression, superior orbital fissure, round and oval openings).
Objective - to study the craniometric and topographic-anatomical characteristics of the depression of the trigeminal nerve node (DTNN), round and oval openings, and the superior orbital fissure in various forms of the cerebral skull.
Materials and methods. The study was conducted on male Caucasian turtles, which were divided into 3 groups according to the transverse-longitudinal cranial index: dolicho-, meso- and brachycranes.
Results. It was found that the morphometric characteristics of the depression of the trigeminal nerve node correlated with the transverse-longitudinal dimensions of the skull, its width (transverse size) changed in the groups of mesocrans and brachycranes and the distance from the top of the pyramid to the medial edge of the depression in the groups of lobes-hawkranes and mesocrans. The sizes of the holes in which the branches of the trigeminal nerve pass (the upper orbital fissure, round and oval holes) also differed. Attention is drawn to the differences in some characteristics of the contralateral sides of the study.
Conclusion. The analysis of the formation parameters for the DTNN and branches of the trigeminal nerve should be carried out taking into account the shape of the cerebral skull and for each side separately. It can be assumed that the morphometric differences of the studied formations are due to the functional asymmetry of the brain (right-handed, left-handed), however, this requires special research.
About the Authors
Lyudmila V. ShanginaRussian Federation
Lecturer, Post-graduate student at the Department of Normal Anatomy, MMedA, St. Petersburg
Evgeniya M. Nesvit
Russian Federation
Ivan V. Gaivoronsky
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
References
1. Bhattarai R., Panthi S., Yadav G.K., Bhandari S., Acharya R., Sharma A., Shah P.K., Koirala S., et al. Morphometric analysis of foramen ovale, foramen spinosum, and foramen rotundum of human skull using computed tomography scan: a cross-sectional study. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2023;85(5):1731-1736. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000609.
2. Feng F., Xu Q., Wu Q., Jia C., Cai Y. Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation Through the Foramen Rotundum Versus the Foramen Ovale for V2 Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pain Physician. 2023;26(6):627-633.
3. Gerber A.M. Improved visualization of the foramen ovale for percutaneous approaches to the gasserian ganglion. Technical note. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1994;80(1):156-159. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1994.80.1.0156.
4. Kantola V.E., McGarry G.W., Rea P.M. Endonasal, transmaxillary, transpterygoid approach to the foramen ovale: radio-anatomical study of surgical feasibility. Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 2013;127(11):1093-1102. DOI: 10.1017/S0022215113002338.
5. Prakash K.G., Saniya K., Honnegowda T.M., Ramkishore H.S., Nautiyal A. Morphometric and Anatomic Variations of Foramen Ovale in Human Skull and Its Clinical Importance. Asian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2019;14(4):1134-1137. DOI: 10.4103/ajns.
6. Ray B., Gupta N., Ghose S. Anatomic variations of foramen ovale. Kathmandu University Medical Journal (KUMJ). 2005;(3):64-68.
7. Syed A., Olewnik Ł., Georgiev G.P., Iwanaga J., Loukas M., Tubbs R.S. Duplication of the foramen rotundum: A rare case report. Morphologie. 2023;107(356):138-141. DOI: 10.1016/j.morpho.2021.11.004.
8. Tayebi Meybodi A., Mignucci-Jiménez G., Lawton M.T., Liu J.K., Preul M.C., Sun H.Comprehensive microsurgical anatomy of the middle cranial fossa: Part I-Osseous and meningeal anatomy. Frontiers in Surgery. 2023;10:1132774. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1132774.
9. Wang J.Y., Bender M.T., Bettegowda C. Percutaneous Procedures for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America. 2016;27(3):277-295.
10. Zeng F., Zhu M., Wan Q., Yan Y., Li C., Zhang Y. The treatment of V2 + V3 idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia using peripheral nerve radiofrequency thermocoagulation via the foramen rotundum and foramen ovale compared with semilunar ganglion radiofrequency thermocoagulation. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2020;196:106025. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106025.
Review
For citations:
Shangina L.V., Nesvit E.M., Gaivoronsky I.V. Craniometric characteristics of the trigeminal ganglion impression and the structures for the exit of its branches in different skull shapes. Humans and their health. 2025;28(2):80-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21626/vestnik/2025-2/10. EDN: 611.831.5