Age-related changes in the area of the human corpus callosum
https://doi.org/10.21626/vestnik/2022-2/06
Abstract
Objective: to carry out a comparative analysis of the area of the corpus callosum in men and women in adolescence, old age, and old age according to magnetic resonance imaging data. Material and methods. The results of magnetic resonance imaging studies of the brain of 138 patients (72 men and 66 women) were analyzed. The entire study material was divided into three groups. The first group included 44 adolescents (21 men and 23 women aged 16-21 years); the second group included 50 elderly people (27 men and 23 women aged 56-74 years); the third group included 44 seniors (24 men and 20 women aged 75-88 years). We determined the area of the corpus callosum in the sagittal projection along the midline. Results. The analysis of the results of the study revealed a tendency for the prevalence of cerebellar area parameters in boys and girls in comparison to the elderly and senile age representatives (p>0.05). There was a tendency for prevalence of cerebral body area parameters in elderly subjects over elderly ones (p>0.05). In all age groups there was a tendency for superiority of cerebral body area parameters in men compared to women (p>0.05). Conclusion. The obtained results of the in vivo comparative analysis of the area of the corpus callosum in humans in adolescence, old age and senile age extend the scientific knowledge of its age-specific features. Thus, these data can serve as a benchmark of age-related anatomical norm in various instrumental examinations, such as magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography, and provide a foundation for further clinical research.
About the Authors
Anatolii A. Balandin
E.A.Vagner Perm State Medical University (E.A.Vagner PGMU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Guzel' S. Yurushbaeva
E.A.Vagner Perm State Medical University (E.A.Vagner PGMU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina A. Balandina
E.A.Vagner Perm State Medical University (E.A.Vagner PGMU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Coste J., Valderas J.M., Carcaillon-Bentata L. The epidemiology of multimorbidity in France: Variations by gender, age and socioeconomic factors, and implications for surveillance and prevention. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0265842. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265842
2. Flatt T., Partridge L. Horizons in the evolution of aging. BMC Biol. 2018;16(1):93. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-018-0562-z
3. Pal'cev M. Personalized medicine. Nauka v Rossii. 2011;(1):12-17 (in Russ.)
4. Balandin A.A., Balandina I.A., Pankratov M.K. Effectiveness of treatment of elderly patients with traumatic brain injury complicated by subdural hematoma. Advances in gerontology 2021;34(3):461-465 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.34922/AE.2021.34.3.017. EDN: PVHUYK
5. Bukatov V.V., Osipova O.A. Peculiarities of myocardial remodeling in patients of different age groups 6 months after myocardial infarction. Humans and their health. 2021;24(4):34-43 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21626/vestnik/2021-4/05. EDN: ECIDUP
6. Gruzdeva A.A., Ilyin M.V.Compliance, social and psychological profile and satisfaction with cardiological care during in-patient hospitalization in elderly and senile patients. Kursk Scientific and Practical Bulletin “Man and His Health”. 2020;(1):4-12 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21626/vestnik/2020-1/01. EDN: VHHBUR
7. Chernyshova U.S., Habarova T.YU., Sokolov D.A. Influence of structural features of the corpus callosum and the dominant hemisphere on the course of mental processes in adolescence. Central'nyj nauchnyj vestnik. 2018;3(44):12-13 (in Russ.). EDN: YODVSA
8. Paul L.K. Developmental malformation of the corpus callosum: a review of typical callosal development and examples of developmental disorders with callosal involvement. J Neurodev Disord. 2011;3(1):3-27. DOI: 10.1007/s11689-010-9059-y
9. Roland J.L., Snyder A.Z., Hacker C.D., Mitra A., Shimony J.S., Limbrick D.D., Raichle M.E., Smyth M.D. et al. On the role of the corpus callosum in interhemispheric functional connectivity in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(50):13278-13283. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1707050114
10. Tomaiuolo F., Campana S., Collins D.L., Fonov V.S., Ricciardi E., Sartori G., Pietrini P., Kupers R. et al. Morphometric changes of the corpus callosum in congenital blindness. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107871. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107871
11. Biryukov A.N., Medvedeva YU.I., Hazov P.D. Age and sex aspects of MRI callosometry. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskoj medicinskoj akademii poslediplomnogo obrazovaniya. 2011;3(4):59-63 (in Russ.). EDN: OXMLNV
12. Boyagina O.D. Planimetric analysis of individual variability and sexual dimorphism of the corpus callosum of people in adulthood according to MRI images. Morfologiya. 2015;9(4):21-25 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.26641/1997-9665.2015.4.21-25. EDN: UVZVXY
13. Allouh M.Z., Al Barbarawi M.M., Ali H.A., Mustafa A.G., Alomari S.O. Morphometric Analysis of the Corpus Callosum According to Age and Sex in Middle Eastern Arabs: Racial Comparisons and Clinical Correlations to Autism Spectrum Disorder. Front Syst Neurosci. 2020;14:30. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2020.00030
14. Bogolepova I.N., Malofeeva L.I., Agapov P.A., Sveshnikov A.V., Malofeeva I.G. Age-related changes in the cortical formations of the brain of men in the aging process. Asimmetriya. 2019;13(3):5-14 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.25692/ASY.2019.13.3.001. EDN: XGNNXL
15. Kolomiytsev A.K. Age-related changes in nucleus dorsalis n. vagi and nucleus sensorius superior n. trigemini. Bulletin of higher educational institutions. North Caucasus region. Natural sciences. 2013;3(175):101-104 (in Russ.). EDN: QJCFXJ
16. Balandina I.A., Balandin A.A., Balandin V.A., Zheleznov L.M. Regularities of organometric characteristics of cerebellum in young and old age. Journal of Global Pharma Technology. 2017;9(3):49-53
17. Mattson M.P., Arumugam T.V. Hallmarks of Brain Aging: Adaptive and Pathological Modification by Metabolic States. Cell Metab. 2018;27(6):1176-1199. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.05.011
18. Patra A., Singla R.K., Chaudhary P., Malhotra V. Morphometric Analysis of the Corpus Callosum Using Cadaveric Brain: An Anatomical Study. Asian J Neurosurg. 2020;15(2):322-327.
19. Nemirovich-Danchenko N. M., Hodanovich M.Yu. Perspectives on combating brain aging: editing the telomerase gene in neural stem cells in vivo.Russian journal of genetics. 2020;56(4):387-401. DOI 10.31857/S0016675820040098. EDN: CSCBUW
20. Sikora E., Bielak-Zmijewska A., Dudkowska M., Krzystyniak A., Mosieniak G., Wesierska M., Wlodarczyk J. Cellular Senescence in Brain Aging. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:646924. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.646924
21. Zuev V.A., Mezenceva M.V., Shaposhnikova G.M. Gliosis as a triggering mechanism of the process of mammalian brain aging. Mezhdunarodnyj akademicheskij zhurnal Rossijskoj akademii estestvennyh nauk. 2014;(4):9-22 (in Russ.). EDN: TUAETH
22. Grimm A., Eckert A. Brain aging and neurodegeneration: from a mitochondrial point of view. J Neurochem. 2017;143(4):418-431. DOI: 10.1111/jnc.14037
Review
For citations:
Balandin A.A., Yurushbaeva G.S., Balandina I.A. Age-related changes in the area of the human corpus callosum. Humans and their health. 2022;25(2):64-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21626/vestnik/2022-2/06
Views:
456
Email this article 